arXiv (All)
open access
Reasoning Hijacking: The Fragility of Reasoning Alignment in Large Language Models
Current LLM safety research predominantly focuses on mitigating Goal Hijacking, preventing attackers from redirecting a model's high-level objective (e.g., from "summarizing emails" to "phishing users"). In this paper, we argue that this perspective is incomplete and highlight a critical vulnerabili
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- actr: aligning thoughts and responses for multilingual safety in reasoning llms#1132255
- BlueSTAR: Tiered Agentic Architecture for Autonomous Cyber Defense#999533
- Securing Large Language Models: Addressing Bias, Misinformation, and Prompt Attacks#1035267
- MITRE-SAGE: A Multi-Agent Cybersecurity Question-Answering Model#793861
- MITRE-SAGE: A Multi-Agent Cybersecurity Question-Answering Model#789842
Record · ID 1141472
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive