arXiv (All)
open access
Shaping Opinion: Quantifying the Psychological Impact of Autonomous Multi-Agent LLM Interactions
Natural-sounding multi-agent conversational AI is increasingly deployed, fundamentally altering human-machine interaction and human information processing. While prior work largely focuses on algorithmic failure, this study investigates the cognitive ergonomics and socio-cognitive impact of algorith
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CLAIM: Calibration of Legitimacy through AI Messaging - A Theory of How Conversational AI Shapes Minority and Majority Voices in Group Deliberation#485962
- Unmasking conversational bias in AI multiagent systems.#469335
- Targeted and Traceable Investigation of Multi-Agent LLM Dialogue via Semantic Bundling of Knowledge Graphs#1130628
- Calibrating LLM Judges for Human and AI Conversations#1077360
- Psychological decoupling in responses to AI: emotional reactivity and behavioral discourse in digital environments.#354506
Record · ID 1141691
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive