arXiv (All)
open access
Commitment Hierarchies under Intent Revision: A Belief-Revision Account of Salvage in Tool-Use Agents
When a user changes their mind partway through a task, an agent that has already split the task into sub-goals and paid for tool calls must decide, per cached sub-result, whether to keep, patch, or discard it (salvage), restarting wastes valid work and continuing unchanged answers the old question.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Token Savings: A Systematic Study of Context Compression in LLM Agents#1117673
- Thinking Twice about Virtue and Vice: Philosophical Situationism and the Vicious Minds Hypothesis#117884
- Agent-Integrated Software: Interaction Contracts and Continuous Assurance#673573
- Operationalizing Ethics for AI Agents: How Developers Encode Values into Repository Context Files#168390
- Versioned Transitive Dependency-Closure Binding and Operation-Time Effect Governance for Agent Skills: ClosureBound#973537
Record · ID 1141775
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive