arXiv (All)
open access
Relevance Is Not Sufficient Evidence: Detecting Evidence Gaps Before Generation in RAG
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds large language models in external sources, but retrieved passages often name the right entities without providing the facts needed to answer. Even when instructed to abstain, 12 generators answer 40.0-99.3% of insufficient-evidence questions. Training gen
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- EnSI-RAG: Entity-Structure-Indexed Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Long-Document Question Answering#480087
- Chunk Twice, Embed Once: A Systematic Study of Segmentation and Representation Trade-offs in Chemistry-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation#1013426
- Precision Grounding: augmenting large language models with evidence-based databases for trustworthy genetic variant summarization.#244253
- Large Language Models (LLMs) for Evidence Synthesis: An Exploratory Evaluation and A New Approach for Automated Data Extraction and Validation#260560
- Emergent Misalignment Is Not Magical#793339
Record · ID 1141791
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive