arXiv (All)
open access
Do Evidence-Reading Diagnostics Improve Interface Selection in Small LLM Recommenders?
Behavioral tests measure how a language model reads evidence. We ask whether those measurements help choose a recommendation interface. We evaluate six small instruction-tuned checkpoints across four recommendation domains with chronological evaluation and 3,426 evaluation users. Each request ranks
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- RPCBench: A Benchmark for Proactive Premise Critique in LLM-based Recommendation#820915
- Recommendation Ranking Off-Policy Evaluation under Ranking-Dependent Examination via Examination-Relevance Decomposition#1129638
- Recommender System as Slow and Fast Thinkers#924815
- Recommender System as Slow and Fast Thinkers#920581
- Neutralizing Popularity Bias in LLM-based Recommendation via Counterfactual Reasoning Guidelines#972904
Record · ID 1141794
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive