arXiv (All)
open access
Your Benchmark Is Not Saturated: Reviving Multiple-Choice Evaluation with Answer Pooling
Multiple-choice benchmarks are cheap to grade and are running out of room, and the standard remedy, writing harder items, is slow and repeated for every benchmark. A saturated benchmark still holds a harder task. Each question's wrong options are written for that question alone, so a model can score
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Choices Speak Louder than Questions#1131383
- Rewarding Efficient Reasoning Improves Abstention on Underspecified Tasks in Reasoning Models#1034823
- Dynamically Allocating Evaluation Effort for Model Ranking#793826
- Dynamically Allocating Evaluation Effort for Model Ranking#789821
- OSCAR: Order-aware Scoring and Calibration for AI Rankings#1050313
Record · ID 1141816
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive