arXiv (All)
open access
On Task Scope and Information Retention in Source Coding
We argue that dividing codec design into Coding for Machines (CfM) and Coding for Humans (CfH) is a misleading distinction for deciding what information a codec may discard. Receiver identity does not determine admissible information loss. The required rate depends on task scope, including the predi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An Empirical Cost Attribution of Context-Compression Gateways in Multi-Turn Coding Agents#1036797
- On the Effectiveness of Context Compression for Repository-Level Tasks: An Empirical Investigation#14091
- The Hidden Cost of Reproducibility: Commercial Software Dependency in Published Research and the Version Accessibility Gap#626791
- Heuristics for Programming Codes#948162
- An Empirical Study of Utility and Disclosure Risk for Tabular Data Synthesis Models: In-Depth Analysis and Interesting Findings#405976
Record · ID 1141892
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive