arXiv (All)
open access
A Benchmark & Dataset for Detecting AI-Manipulated Visual Evidence in the Court System
Photographic evidence is becoming increasingly vulnerable to forms of alteration and fabrication that existing legal and technical workflows are not well equipped to evaluate. Surveillance frames, dashcam stills, and phone photographs may be used to establish presence, sequence, causation, damage, o
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Applications of Character Evidence in Civil and Criminal Cases#648143
- FACT: A Forensic Agent with Compiled Tool-Use Trajectories for AI-Generated Image Detection#973496
- From understanding to justifying: Computational reliabilism for AI-based forensic evidence evaluation#721675
- Computer vision in law enforcement: implications for the rule of law#1135932
- Legal Framework Governing Forensic Feature Comparison Evidence#2247
Record · ID 1142092
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive