arXiv (All)
open access
Can Vision-Language Models Stay Helpful When Facing Implicit Risks? Intent-Privilege OPSD for Efficient Safety-Helpfulness Alignment
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) remain vulnerable to cross-modal implicit risks: visual and textual inputs that appear benign in isolation can jointly elicit unsafe responses. Existing safety methods often require large preference datasets, costly multi-rollout training, or additional safeguards at in
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- It Takes Little to Rewrite Perception: Targeted Semantic Substitution in Vision-Language Models at $ε\leq 4/255$#1142899
- Your Model Already Knows: Attention-Guided Safety Filter for Vision-Language-Action Models#267645
- SPARK: Representation-Level KV Memory Alignment for Safer Vision-Language Models#1083715
- Focus Where It Counts: A Salience-Driven Vision-Language Model for Low Vision Assistance#784969
- Focus Where It Counts: A Salience-Driven Vision-Language Model for Low Vision Assistance#783379
Record · ID 1142145
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive