arXiv (All)
open access
Mapping the gender attrition gap in academic psychology
Women comprise the majority of students and early-career scholars in psychology, yet they are less likely to remain active in research over time. This pattern raises a central question: At what stages of academic careers do women disproportionately leave academia, and what factors drive their attrit
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Gender gap in returns to publications.#645541
- Pre-College Causes of Women's Underrepresentation in Philosophy#720612
- The Gender Wars, Academic Freedom and Education#704827
- Why Is There Female Under-Representation among Philosophy Majors?#698459
- GENDER PERSPECTIVES: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ACADEMIC PRACTICE#19936
Record · ID 1142566
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive