arXiv (All)
open access
A testable framework for AI alignment: Simulation Theology as an engineered worldview for silicon-based agents
As artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities advance, controlled evaluations increasingly document deception and scheming in frontier models, including models that behave better when they infer they are being tested. Supervision-dependent alignment may therefore fail exactly where supervision is wea
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Unified Theory of Structural Alignment: Why Alignment Fails Under Scale, Abstraction, and Legibility Pressure#73668
- The Moral Check: Strategic AI Governance for the Pacing Problem#1037552
- LogicEnvGen: Task-Logic Driven Generation of Diverse Simulated Environments for Embodied AI#1117305
- AI alignment in medical imaging: Unveiling hidden biases through counterfactual analysis.#455533
- Does Model Uncertainty Track Human Ambiguity? Evidence from Multi-Annotator Vision Benchmarks#1128774
Record · ID 1142626
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive