arXiv (All)
open access
Overconfidence and Calibration in Medical VQA: Empirical Findings and Hallucination-Aware Mitigation
As vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in clinical decision support, more than accuracy is required: knowing when to trust their predictions is equally critical. Yet, a comprehensive and systematic investigation into the overconfidence of these models remains notably scarce in th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Skin-Deep: A Geometric Diagnostic for Alignment Fragility in Large Language Model Representations#1156399
- Reading Right, Answering Wrong: How Visual Configuration Changes Affect Evidence Use in VLMs#1061402
- MedGround: Bridging the Evidence Gap in Medical Vision-Language Models with Verified Grounding Data#974296
- OmniMed-Jev: Calibrating LVLM Confidence for Trustworthy Medical Multimodal Decisions via System One#1155316
- Identifying and Resolving Pitfalls of Knowledge-Based VQA Benchmarks: Auditing, Repairing, and Augmenting#1123151
Record · ID 1142654
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive