arXiv (All)
open access
Certifying Residual Architectures from Their Primitives: A Sharp Stability Threshold
Whether a deep residual architecture trains stably is usually determined by training it, which is expensive and answers the question only for the architecture, depth, and floating-point format tested. In practice, stability is secured by heuristics for where to place normalization and which type to
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The BatchNorm Illusion: Diagnosing Normalization Artifacts in Machine Unlearning Evaluation#1069931
- A Journey to the Edge of Stability#1116621
- R$^2$M: Real-Aware Residual Model Merging for Robust and Generalizable Deepfake Detection#999674
- EdgeVolution: democratizing multi-objective neural architecture search and end-to-end deployment on microcontrollers.#312461
- BLINK: Batch Normalization-based Integrity Checkpoints for In-Situ Detection and Mitigation of Diverse Weight Corruptions in DNN Accelerators#974870
Record · ID 1142747
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive