arXiv (All)
open access
Inference-Layer Security: Defending Against Adversarial Inference and Infrastructure Abuse
A Technical Report: Operating a large language model (LLM) as a service requires more than inference infrastructure: the provider must also defend against adversarial interactions that seek to exploit the service, including jailbreaking for harmful use, sophisticated denial of service, and distillat
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can Prompt Anonymity Protect Your Identity From LLM Providers?#1118976
- Securing Large Language Models: Addressing Bias, Misinformation, and Prompt Attacks#1035267
- CAITLYN: Can LLM Agents Autonomously Synthesize Defenses against Emerging Injection Attacks?#784763
- CAITLYN: Can LLM Agents Autonomously Synthesize Defenses against Emerging Injection Attacks?#783173
- Your Mailbox Is Mine: Prompt Injection Attacks Against Real-World LLM Email Agents#1036558
Record · ID 1142840
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive