arXiv (All)
open access
When Does Randomized Oversight Align AI Agents That Can Conceal?
Oversight changes the evidence it relies on. We ask when randomized audits and scoring align AI agents that can conceal misconduct and alter records. Stronger auditing makes undeterred violations better hidden. Because the provider writes the agent's objective, sanctions need not stop at forfeiture,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can AI Oversight Be Zero Knowledge?#1160918
- Can AI Oversight Be Zero Knowledge?#1157343
- <b>Unregulated Markets for Audit Services </b>#70333
- Autonomous AI Agents and Criminal Liability: Attribution, Digital Evidence, and Human Accountability#121616
- The Pitfalls of "Security by Obscurity" And What They Mean for Transparent AI#163515
Record · ID 1142863
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive