arXiv (All)
open access
Which Models Work Well Together? Measuring Heterogeneity for LLM Team Selection
The performance ceiling of an LLM team is constrained not only by individual model capabilities, but also by inter-member error resonance and predictive differences. Although heterogeneous teaming is often observed to be effective in practice, existing approaches lack complementarity metrics that ar
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CFLoRA: Federated Fine-tuning of LLMs with Complementary Factors for Error-free Aggregation#1117859
- The Impact of Top Management Team Characteristics on the ESG Performance of Chinese Listed Companies#278011
- From Parameters to Behaviors: A Survey of Model Fusion for Large Language Models#1014145
- English is Not All You Need: Systematically Exploring the Role of Multilinguality in LLM Post-Training#1048631
- Trade-offs in Medical LLM Adaptation: An Empirical Study in French QA#287161
Record · ID 1142875
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive