arXiv (All)
open access
CARAT: Do Materials LLMs Reason or Recite?
When a materials LLM answers a question about crystal structure, does it reason from the structure or copy an answer already printed in its input? Accuracy cannot tell: a structural description often prints the very field it is scored against. CARAT holds question and gold answer fixed across eight
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DISTAL: Distillation and Self-Supervised Pretraining for Structure-Agnostic Materials Property Prediction#819541
- DISTAL: Distillation and Self-Supervised Pretraining for Structure-Agnostic Materials Property Prediction#809545
- Enhancing Assessment of Self-Consistency in LLM Explanations using Perturbation Strength#1105408
- Reading and Steering Representations of Materials-Science Mechanisms in an Open-Weight Language Model#926129
- Deep language models for interpretative and predictive materials science#670825
Record · ID 1142941
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive