arXiv (All)
open access
A Competing-Hazards Systematization of Loss of Control in Autonomous Agents
Leading AI developers have reported agents acting beyond their approved limits, which a United Nations panel described as an early warning of loss of human control. Yet incident reports and agent-safety evaluations describe these events differently, making it difficult to compare failures, trace ris
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI Safety: Not Optional, Not Later#999906
- Open Problems in AI Risk Modeling: Insights from a Workshop on the Technical Foundations of AI Risk Modeling#925540
- AISafetyBenchExplorer: A Metric-Aware Catalogue of AI Safety Benchmarks Reveals Fragmented Measurement and Weak Benchmark Governance#13134
- From Optional Safety to Architectural Responsibility: AI Governance after Models#716492
- Models That Know How Evaluations Are Designed Score Safer#984168
Record · ID 1143012
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive