arXiv (All)
open access
Policy-Conditioned AI-Use Detection: An Evidentiary Framework for Academic Publishing
Major venues now publish detailed rules about how authors, reviewers, and area chairs may use AI, and those rules differ by role, by task, and by what must be disclosed. AI detection, the instrument usually proposed to enforce them, estimates something else: whether an AI model wrote the text. We ar
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI - to use or not to use, that is the question...#690652
- When AI Starts Reading Battery Papers Like a Researcher.#354607
- AI detection in Italian essays through different text representations and adversarial robustness evaluation.#360681
- When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.192.#9519
- AI in the headlines: the portrayal of the ethical issues of artificial intelligence in the media#964416
Record · ID 1143028
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive