arXiv (All)
open access
Does Gradient Conflict Predict the Understanding--Generation Trade-off? A Controlled Audit of Conflict-Metric Validity in Unified Multimodal Models
Unified multimodal models (UMMs) are increasingly designed around gradient conflict between understanding and generation objectives. The premise that reducing these metrics improves the downstream understanding-generation trade-off has never been tested directly. We audit it in a controlled testbed,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- UniRect-CoT: Enhancing Generation in Unified Multimodal Models via Reflective Rectification with Inherent Understanding#1128576
- Learning Multimodal Embeddings with Evidence-Aligned Readout#1118732
- MMGR: Multi-Modal Generative Reasoning Benchmark and Evaluation#999700
- Same Semantics, Different Outcome: On the Modality Robustness of Multimodal LLMs under Knowledge Conflict#819989
- Uncovering Understanding-Generation Synergy in Native Unified Multimodal Models: From Representation, Task to System#821627
Record · ID 1143066
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive