arXiv (All)
open access
Shifting Mechanisms: How Positional Encoding Choice Shapes In-Context Retrieval
Language models increasingly use architectures that vary attention span and positional encoding across layers, such as applying RoPE with sliding-window attention and NoPE with global attention (SWA NoPE). However, how these choices shape in-context retrieval remains unclear. To study this question,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Identifying Crucial Attention Heads for Multilingual Language Models: Retrieval and Retrieval-Transition Heads#1070770
- LoGo: Token-Level Dynamic Local-Global Attention#798184
- LoGo: Token-Level Dynamic Local-Global Attention#796771
- Slow to See, Slow to Suppress: Understanding the Effects of Modality in Context-Memory Conflicts#819749
- Slow to See, Slow to Suppress: Understanding the Effects of Modality in Context-Memory Conflicts#809753
Record · ID 1143131
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive