arXiv (All)
open access
More Choices, Fewer Decisions: Ordinal-Scale Bias in JEV-like Direct-Decision Models
Direct-decision models turn text into low-latency structured labels and scores, making them attractive for classification and automatic evaluation. Yet reliability requires more than accuracy: a model must also use the ordinal decision scale supplied by the user faithfully. We analyze JEV~1.13 and t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Human-Anchored Inference for Ranking New Models with Large Language Model Judges#1014189
- Do Reviewers Still Reward Lexical Complexity? A Frozen-Rater Study of Preference Drift in 124K ICLR Reviews#985827
- Chinese-Jev: Bringing System One Model to Chinese-Language Tasks#1132166
- When Calibration Rankings Reverse: Accuracy-Controlled Evaluation for Fair Comparison of LLMs#798981
- When Calibration Rankings Reverse: Accuracy-Controlled Evaluation for Fair Comparison of LLMs#797567
Record · ID 1143428
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive