arXiv (All)
open access
Forging LLM Authorship Fingerprints with Targeted Rewriting
Model-attribution classifiers can often identify which language model produced a text, making model-specific writing patterns a signal of provenance. Accurate attribution on unmodified text, however, does not show whether the prediction still identifies the original source after deliberate rewriting
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Authorship in artificial intelligence‐generated works: Exploring originality in text prompts and artificial intelligence outputs through philosophical foundations of copyright and collage protection#203236
- One-shot Style Transfer LLM log-probabilities for Authorship Attribution and Verification#820266
- Attribution Quality in AI-Generated Content:Benchmarking Style Embeddings and LLM Judges#984078
- Trends and challenges in authorship analysis: a review of ML, DL, and LLM approaches#1002124
- Reason in Style: Discovering and Controlling Style in Language Models#1155659
Record · ID 1143432
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive