arXiv (All)
open access
Where MLLMs Fail and Why: Causal Task Decomposition for Capability Failure Diagnosis
artificial-intelligencecomputation-and-languagecomputer-vision-and-pattern-recognitionmachine-learning
End-to-end accuracy on compositional tasks records how often MLLMs fail, but cannot distinguish whether a failure reflects an intrinsic deficit in the targeted capability or a cascading error from an upstream prerequisite. We propose a causal decomposition framework that isolates these two failure m
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Navigating Unreliable Parametric and Contextual Knowledge: Explicit Knowledge Conflict Resolution for LLM Inference#290628
- Parameter Importance-Driven Continual Learning for Foundation Models#1063809
- PrefixGuard: Online Failure Warning and Trace-Grounded Diagnosis for LLM Agents#1117393
- AgentRx: Diagnosing AI Agent Failures from Execution Trajectories#798756
- AgentRx: Diagnosing AI Agent Failures from Execution Trajectories#797342
Record · ID 1143452
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive