arXiv (All)
open access
Optimal Design for Active Preference Learning with Biased LLM Judges
Learning from human preferences is central to large language model (LLM) alignment, but human preference annotation is costly. Active preference learning reduces this cost by selecting informative comparisons, and LLM judges can provide additional scalable feedback. However, the preferences of the j
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Active Learning for Decision Making#486183
- JEV vs. LLMs as Rubric Judges: Cheaper, Faster, and Wrong in the Same Places#1077696
- Style-Debiased DPO: Updating LLM Knowledge with Factuality-Aware Synthetic Preference Data#1122560
- Safety as a Constraint: Fine-Tuning a LLM Recommender to Explain Itself#1071425
- Preference Goal Tuning: Post-Training as Latent Control for Frozen Policies#189228
Record · ID 1143461
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive