arXiv (All)
open access
Robust Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning from Corrupted Human Feedback
Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) learns from human comparisons, which can be corrupted or deliberately manipulated. This paper studies online risk-sensitive RLHF with static conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) under adversarial preference-label flips. We consider additive linear reward
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Systematic Review of Human-Centered Explainability in Reinforcement Learning: Transferring the RCC Framework to Support Epistemic Trustworthiness#707577
- R3: Robust Rubric-Agnostic Reward Models#1110091
- CRAX: Fast Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmarking#1118615
- Beyond Verbalized Confidence: Calibrating Reasoners with Differentiable Readouts#1129470
- Unlearnable, or Unmeasured? On the Reliability of Difficulty Labels in RLVR#1154382
Record · ID 1143539
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive