arXiv (All)
open access
A Proposed Rubric for Evaluating Expressed Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Model Responses
We propose a rubric for assessing expressed clinical reasoning in model responses, drawing on three bodies of work: medical education assessment frameworks (ART, SCT, Key Feature Problems and OSCE); clinical LLM benchmarks (MedR-Bench, HealthBench, TIMER-Bench, DR.BENCH, PrIME-LLM and PatientSafeBen
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Structured Debate-Mixture-of-Agents Framework for Complex Clinical Diagnostic Decision Support#972021
- Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation#679244
- Code-as-Auditor: Executable Compliance Reasoning via Regulation-to-Code#1013799
- Code-as-Auditor: Executable Compliance Reasoning via Regulation-to-Code#978500
- A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoning#158687
Record · ID 1143906
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive