arXiv (All)
open access
MADBench: Benchmarking the Security of Multi-Agent Debate
Multi-agent debate (MAD) can improve large language model (LLM) reasoning by allowing multiple agents to exchange and critique their answers to the same task. However, the interactions that enable agents to correct mistakes can also spread adversarial errors and steer the agents toward an incorrect
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CLAIR-Fin: An Adversarial Multi-Agent Framework for Claim-Level Verification and Adaptive Debate in Cross-Modal Financial QA#985211
- MiniRep: Robust Reputation-Based Aggregation for Multi-Agent Debate#1144264
- JuryFlow: Disagreement-Guided Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Evaluation#1154372
- Attesting Outputs and Delegation Ancestry in Multi-Agent AI Systems#622440
- Break It Down, Pass It On: Cross-Task Skill Transfer in LLM Agents#471273
Record · ID 1144113
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive