arXiv (All)
open access
Also Small Models Can Reasonably Self-Evaluate Their Confidence
This study systematically evaluates self-evaluation-based uncertainty quantification across different language models of varying sizes on question-answering tasks spanning general to specialized knowledge domains. Using various self-evaluation methods where models judge their own predictions, we exa
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Prompting the Unknown: Understanding Response Uncertainty in Large Language Models#821661
- Calibration of Self-Reported Confidence and Accuracy of Large Language Models in Medical Question Answering.#320488
- When Guessing is Rewarded: Rethinking Language Model Evaluation with Distributional Uncertainty Scoring#1156215
- AskQE: Question Answering as Automatic Evaluation for Machine Translation#1049630
- Verbalized and Internal Probabilities Are Coupled in Large Language Models#1155762
Record · ID 1144445
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive