arXiv (All)
open access
Do Better Goal Representations Improve Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning?
Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (GCRL) relies heavily on how target goals are represented to the policy. While recent methods encode goals via temporal distance, occupancy, or controllability, it remains unclear how much downstream performance actually depends on representation quality. We s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Jaxolotl: A Unified High-Performance Benchmark Suite for LTL-Based Multi-Task RL#1142363
- Jaxolotl: A Unified High-Performance Benchmark Suite for LTL-Based Multi-Task RL#1122297
- ArenaFlow: From Trajectory Ranking to Hierarchical Credit Propagation for Open-Ended Agent RL#1035782
- Consolidating RLVR Capabilities Across Domains: A Deep Dive into Fusion Paradigms#1035607
- Advantage Weighted Matching: Aligning RL with Pretraining in Diffusion Models#820254
Record · ID 1145068
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive