arXiv (All)
open access
Is the regression $F$-test doubly robust?
We study the robustness of the $F$-test in random design linear models, and reach a somewhat nuanced conclusion. On the positive side, one of our main results is that the size of the test is close to its nominal level as soon as either the distribution of the normalised error vector is close to unif
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences#675915
- A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Size Controllability of Heteroskedasticity Robust Test Statistics#147041
- Robustness Analysis as a Procedure for Determining Difference-Makers#726571
- Minimum Specification Perturbation: Robustness as Distance-to-Falsification in Causal Inference#1141528
- Foucault: The Premier Disabled Philosopher of Disability (My Love Letter to Foucault)#114739
Record · ID 1145072
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive