PsyArXiv
metadata only
Metacognitive Ownership in Human–AI Regulation: Construct Definition, Boundaries, and a Research Agenda
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools can suggest criteria, evaluate learners’ work, and recommend or carry out revisions, yet it is often unclear how learners direct these decisions when they study with AI. In this conceptual paper, we introduce metacognitive ownership: learners’ governance of standar
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Metacognitive Ownership in Human–AI Regulation: Construct Definition, Boundaries, and a Research Agenda#1148328
- Beyond Correction: Epistemic Safety as a Mediator for Policy Transfer in Large Language Models#105624
- MARLA: A Conceptual Scaffold for Regulatory Learning under the EU AI Act#971538
- <b>Empowering the AI-Literate Learners: Evaluating the Intersection of Digital Governance and Academic Integrity – A Systematic Literature Review</b>#11787
- <b>Empowering the AI-Literate Learners: Evaluating the Intersection of Digital Governance and Academic Integrity – A Systematic Literature Review</b>#11786
Record · ID 1148224
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive