ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Continuous Versus Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with delayed recovery, impaired mobility, increased morbidity, longer hospital stay and greater cost. Adductor canal block has recently been shown to improve the pain control of patients following TKA. It is not known whether a single shot technique or a continuous catheter-based infusion technique provides optimal analgesia. The investigators hypothesize that a continuous technique would provide better analgesia and permit patients to achieve objective measures of recovery following TKA than a single shot technique.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Continuous Versus Single Injection Adductor Canal Blocks for Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty#886222
- Enhanced Recovery After Major Surgery and Chronic Pain for Total Knee Arthroplasty#1101732
- Single Shot Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty#883275
- Comparing Local Anesthesia With and Without iPACK Block#1045952
- Adductor Canal Block (ACB) Before and After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)#837512
Record · ID 1151308
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive