ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Passive Mobilization With Place and Hold vs Active Mobilization Therapy After Flexor Tendon Repair
The aim of this study is to investigate if active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair in fingers gives better range of motion, strength, risk of rupture and patient satisfaction compared with passive mobilisation with place and hold after flexor tenon repair.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Dynamic Hand Splint on Hand ROM Post Extensor Tendon Repair#915078
- Effectiveness of Conservative Interventions in the Treatment of Trigger Finger#850035
- Effects of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Mirror Therapy in Hemiplegic Stroke#874176
- Functional Mobility in the Elderly: Influence of Morphological, Neuromuscular and Training Parameters#979229
- The Effect of Graston Technique on Ankle Mobility, Sit-Reach Test and Y-Balance Test#896425
Record · ID 1151477
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive