ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Conservative Versus Liberal Oxygenation Targets in Critically Ill Children
A feasibility study to determine if it is possible to perform a safe, adequately powered, and affordable multi-centre study in critically ill children comparing current practice of liberal targets for systemic oxygen levels with more conservative targets.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is Peri-operative Hyperoxemia a Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications?#889299
- Comparison of High Flow vs Standard Nasal Cannula in Children With Burns Under Sedoanalgesia#873932
- Closed Loop Oxygen Control in INtubated Critically Ill Patients#851657
- Effects of Different Fresh Gas Flows on Carboxyhemoglobin Levels and Postoperative Patient Outcomes in Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery#908203
- High-flow nasal oxygen in perioperative and critical care: a bibliometric analysis.#415533
Record · ID 1152047
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive