ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Technique
EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a safe and effective method for diagnosing pancreatic and peripancreatic solid masses. The aim of this study is to compare the two aspiration methods in EUS-FNA: negative-pressure suction with syringe vs. capillary sampling with stylet slow-pull technique. We will evaluate the diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of the specimens obtained by EUS-FNA with two aspiration methods.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Masses: Histological and Immunohistochemical Evaluation#840837
- Evaluation of Diagnostic Yield of EUS-Guided Tissue Sampling#851623
- Comparison of Two Endoscopic Biopsic Needles for Pancreatic Tumors#1095030
- EUS-FNA With 22G Procore Needles vs 22G Conventional Needles#865788
- Study on Microflora Characteristics of Pancreatic Solid Lesions Via Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration/Biopsy#1045984
Record · ID 1152106
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive