ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula and Standard Face Mask Oxygen Therapy in Children With Bronchiolitis
The study aims to compare the efficacy of two different oxygenation methods on decrease respiratory rate, heart rate, and clinical respiratory score in children with moderate to severe bronchiolitis requiring oxygen therapy. 1. Standard face mask oxygen therapy (St-FMOT) 2. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNCOT)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Application of a Mask in Patients With Severe Covid-19 Already Treated With High-flow Nasal Cannula.#918989
- CPAP vs High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Treating Sleep Apnea in Children#889888
- The Effect of Chest Compression and Ventilation Coordination During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.#1140082
- Evaluation of a Low-cost CPAP Device on Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients#1046265
- Evaluation of the Impact of EHR-Alerts on Clinical Decision Support Pathway Use in Bronchiolitis, and the Impact of Pathway Use on the Prescription of High Flow Nasal Cannula and Other Elements of High Value Care.#1096682
Record · ID 1152289
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive