PhilArchive
open access
On Epistemic Validity and Mathematics
Mathematics is examined in this paper using the criterion of epistemic validity (Eifel, 2025). This paper proposes that mathematics is best understood as epistemically valid abstraction from physical forces acting on objects. Mathematical reliability arises because each step preserves admissible inputs and constraint-governed transformations originally verified in the physical world. Once such relations are established, their outcomes may be reasoned through without reapplying the physical forces themselves. This account explains both the stability of mathematical results and their excellent effectiveness in describing physical reality.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Unformalized Foundations of Mathematical Formalism: An Epistemological Critique#88037
- Invariance as Criterion of Being: Logos as Operator of Distinguishability#705921
- The "Unreasonable" Effectiveness of Mathematics: The Foundational Approach of the Theoretic Alternatives#698411
- Mathematics as the Science of Pure Structure#746569
- Epistemology of Replicability#75300
Record · ID 115248
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive