ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Goal-directed Fluid Management Versus Conventional Fluid Management in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Fluid management is critical in patients undergoing surgery. Goal-directed fluid management (GDFM) protocols have been shown to decrease the length of hospital stay. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of conventional fluid management with Pleth Variability Index (PVI) guided on blood lactate, serum creatinine levels, postoperative kidney injury and the duration of hospital stay.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Hypertonic Saline for Fluid Resuscitation After Cardiac Surgery#1010676
- Restrictive or Individualized Goal-Directed Fluid Replacement Strategy in Ovarian Cancer Cytoreductive Surgery#1030913
- Early Deresuscitation Strategy Driven by Tissue Perfusion in Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients With Acute Renal Failure#841681
- Indicators of Operative and Postoperative Complications in Patients Operated for Hip Fracture#1139877
- Global Variation in Predictors of Uptake of Conservative Kidney Management: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.#342634
Record · ID 1152521
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive