ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Extent of ILM Removal and Its Impact on Outcomes of MH Surgery
Eligible patients who were scheduled for surgery for idiopathic macular hole (MH) were equally randomized to small extent group or large extent group depending on the extent of internal limiting membrane (ILM) to be removed. The ILM was peeled in round shape with the radius of either 0.75-disc diameter or 1.5-disc diameter according to the group. The primary analysis was conducted to identify the difference of functional and anatomical outcomes between the two groups. Subsequent analysis was performed to reveal the relationship between the functional and anatomical outcomes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Evaluation of With or Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial#804774
- Effects of Pneumatic Vitreolysis on Macular Hole#1093114
- A Study in Subjects With Retinal Detachment#1139934
- Determination of Optimum Duration of Treatment With Bromfenac (Xibrom) Eyedrops Following Cataract Surgery#851640
- NorMIGS - a Study of Micro-invasive Glaucoma Surgery#651155
Record · ID 1153015
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive