ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Improving Quality of Life After Thoracic Surgery Using Patient-Reported Outcomes
This study is designed to test if patient-reported outcomes with automated reporting to clinicians for remote monitoring of postoperative symptoms is feasible and improves quality of life, health outcomes, and service utilization in thoracic surgery patients. Patients undergoing thoracic surgery will be asked to self-report symptoms for remote monitoring by their care team.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mixed-Methods User-Centered Design Evaluation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes System to Enhance Postdischarge Care for Thoracic Surgery Patients.#975667
- Differences in Quality of Life After Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Surgery#1163360
- Resuscitative Thoracotomy Practices#854866
- Impact of Video Discharge Instructions on Heart Failure Patient's Knowledge#1088860
- Early Postoperative Day 0 Chest Tube Removal After Thoracoscopic Minor Surgeries#803011
Record · ID 1153374
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive