ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Grinding Versus Standard Methods for the Treatment of Per-operative Bacteriological Samples Associated With Osteo-articular Sepsis
The main objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic capability (sensitivity and specificity) of standard bacteriological analysis made from one or other of the two sampling processing techniques and perioperative management of samples : the Ultra Turrax method that uses grinding versus the standard method.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficacy and Safety of Antimicrobial Durations Treatment of Infections Associated With Osteosynthesis Material#148780
- Analysis of Pharmacological Aspects Regarding Infection Free Survival After Surgical Treatment of a Periprosthetic Hip Infection: a Microdialysis Study#901969
- Tissue Culture Versus Swab Culture in Prosthetic Joint Infections#811099
- Phage Therapy for the Treatment of a Chronic Enterococcus Faecium Periprosthetic Joint Infection#981034
- Antibacterial Effect and Postoperative Pain After Triton Irrigation Protocol in Necrotic Mandibular Molar#863829
Record · ID 1153676
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive