PhilArchive
open access
Being Sympathetic to Bad-History Wrongdoers
For many philosophers, bad-history wrongdoers are primarily interesting because of what their cases might tell us about the interaction of moral responsibility and history. However, philosophers focusing on blameworthiness have overlooked important questions about blame itself. These bad-history cases are complicated because blame and sympathy are both fitting. When we are careful to consider the rich natures of those two reactions, we see that they conflict in several important ways. We should see bad-history cases as cases about whether and how we should blame, rather than as cases giving us ready insight into the nature of moral responsibility.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Causality and Coextensiveness in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 1.13#116891
- Blameworthiness is Terminable#71579
- ‘‘ ‘The Polluter Pays’: Backward-looking principles of intergenerational Justice and the environment#703985
- Causers, Causes, and Doers#733610
- The Non‐Occurrence Of Events#752165
Record · ID 115410
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive