arXiv (All)
open access
Who Asked for This? Inline Annotations as Authoring Transactions for Provenance in Agentic Authoring
Writing with AI agents turns a paragraph into the outcome of many requests, yet the finished document rarely explains which request produced which change. We introduce Reactant, an interaction paradigm in which authors place typed inline annotations in their original documents. A verified transactio
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinicians' rationale for editing ambient AI-drafted clinical notes: persistent challenges and implications for improvement.#327012
- Lexplorer: Navigating the Complexity of Legal Document Landscapes#1123731
- Reimagining Legal Education: Preparing for an AI-Driven Future#1178486
- Editors And Advisors Notes#445323
- Emerging challenges in legal informatics from machine learning to LLMs - Preface to the proceedings of the 1st PLC workshop#1178260
Record · ID 1154393
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive