arXiv (All)
open access
Scientific Agents: Evaluating Profession-Specific System Prompts on Scientific Tasks
Detailed profession-specific system prompts raise token use and estimated cost per response without a consistent accuracy gain. We evaluate Scientific Agents, an open-source corpus of 503 profession-specific AGENTS.md profiles, with Gemini 3.8 Flash via OpenRouter in the Pi agent harness. We compare
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Overview of the NLPCC 2026 Shared Task 11: Agent-Based Experiment Reproduction from Scientific Papers#998670
- ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents#1123873
- ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents#1081339
- ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents#919422
- SCIRIGOR:Evaluating Open-Ended Scientific Analysis Beyond Final Scores#973792
Record · ID 1154707
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive