arXiv (All)
open access
FACET at WMT 2026 Automated Translation Quality Evaluation Task
Different error types in machine translation require different evidence. Whether meaning is preserved can be judged only against the source, while whether the target is well-formed, or whether it names one entity consistently, can be judged from the target alone. We present FACET, our reference-free
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Improving Term Evaluation in Machine Translation: Variation Matters#986417
- The Blindness of Document-Level Translation Evaluation#973564
- Benchmarking Gender Bias in Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics across Occupations#1035890
- ConGA: Guidelines for Contextual Gender Annotation. a Framework for Annotating Gender in Machine Translation#294832
- Does task decomposition improve automatic NLG evaluation?#821111
Record · ID 1154719
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive