arXiv (All)
open access
Verification Pulses and the Cost of Escaping Wrong Consensus
External verification can correct individual outputs while leaving a self-reinforcing population in the basin of a wrong consensus. We study how the timing and addressing of a fixed verification budget affect recovery in an asynchronous binary register. For a general nonlinear response, we derive th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Enhanced Feedback Mechanisms for Resource-Efficient Incremental Redundancy#1061750
- A Meta-perspective on Reproducibility and Replication Rates#178317
- The Magnitude of Record Backreaction Without a Global Heat Tax: A Weak-Field Audition for Arrow-Specific Record Decoherence, and Why the Leading Answer Is a Null#690792
- Replication Without a Global Arbiter: The Replication Specification, the Attempt Register, and the Community Record Interface#692625
- Finite Distinguishability Budgets and Maintenance Bounds for Physical Observers#726469
Record · ID 1154879
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive