arXiv (All)
open access
Knowing When to Yield: Grounded Arbitration of User Corrections in Text-Based Embodied Agents
How should an embodied agent respond when a person's correction may be wrong? We formulate grounded correction arbitration as a choice among accepting, rejecting, inspecting the world, and asking the speaker. GAVA implements this interface with observation-bounded evidence, legal probes, and a one-s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ANIMASK: What the Model Contributes to Role Play in Simulated Story Worlds#1122680
- Cheap Talk Stabilizes Strategic Interaction in LLM Agents#1110639
- Modelling in the midst of a replication crisis for embodied action semantics: a commentary on Carriere et al. (2026)#148917
- Application of Expectancy Violations Theory to Communication with and Judgments about Embodied Agents during a Decision-Making Task#356411
- Comprehension of action negation involves inhibitory simulation#954517
Record · ID 1154905
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive