arXiv (All)
open access
JusticeAxis: Benchmarking Legal Judgment between Rigid Rule Application and Ungrounded Discretion
A sound judgment applies the law to established facts and weighs the circumstances in which they arose. However, existing methods swing between rigid statute matching and ungrounded discretion, benchmarks score a label or a rubric, and the experience that would supply the balance stays unverified. W
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Escepticismo ante las reglas y pedigree democrático de la dificultad contramayoritaria#75991
- Proportionality, Winner-Take-All, and Distributive Justice#762851
- How Much Punishment Is Deserved? Two Alternatives to Proportionality#108227
- Reasonableness on the Clapham Omnibus: Exploring the outcome-sensitive folk concept of reasonable#714468
- Mens rea ascription, expertise and outcome effects: Professional judges surveyed#745564
Record · ID 1154976
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive