arXiv (All)
open access
What Does a Sharing Question Add? Auditing LLM Survey Scores for Misinformation
Evaluating misinformation requires distinguishing whether readers believe content from whether they would share it. Asking large language models (LLMs) both questions yields two scores, but does the sharing answer contribute information beyond the credibility answer? We audit eight model versions on
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LLM-CEG: Extending the Classification Error Gauge Framework for Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models#138851
- System Attribution in LLM Brand Recommendations: Single Responses Identify the System, Aggregated Brand Profiles Do Not Transfer#1154876
- Dataset Watermarking with Provable Black-Box Detection#1130546
- Detectable Only Where It Is Confounded: What Verified Duplication Counts Say About Membership Evidence in Language Models#673430
- Black-Box Membership Inference via Word-Level Probability Estimation#997613
Record · ID 1155160
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive